Organizations worldwide are racing to develop a universally recognized label for human-made products and services as part of the growing backlash against AI use.

Declarations like Proudly Human, Human-made, 'No A.I' and AI-free are appearing across films, marketing, books, and websites. It is in response to fears that jobs or entire professions are being swept away in a wave of AI-powered automation.

BBC News has counted at least eight different initiatives trying to come up with a label that could get the kind of global recognition that the Fair Trade logo has for ethically made products. However, with so many competing labels, as well as confusion over the definition of 'AI-free', experts say consumers are in danger of being left confused unless a single standard can be agreed upon.

AI is creating significant disruption and competing definitions of what is 'human-made' are confusing consumers, says consumer expert Dr. Amna Khan from Manchester Metropolitan University. A universal definition is essential to build trust, clarification, and confidence, she adds.

The movement to create AI-free certification systems follows generative AI tools being used to replace human work and creativity in various industries including fashion, advertising, publishing, customer services, and music. The organizations trying to come up with the labels include companies and non-profits from the UK, Australia, and the US.

How the certifications work

Some labels like no-ai-icon.com, ai-free.io, and notbyai.fyi can be downloaded for free or for a fee without much or any auditing. Other systems like aifreecert require payment and have a strict vetting process. However, AI experts caution that achieving industry consensus on what truly counts as human-made will be complicated as AI is integrated into many everyday tools.

Generative AI-free

Some believe the line should be drawn at generative AI, which creates content like text, code, music, or video with human prompts. This emerging framework has seen film projects explicitly stating they did not use generative AI, alongside new initiatives like a 'No AI was used' stamp appearing on film posters.

The arts industry is currently experiencing a significant disruption, with entire films and books produced using AI more rapidly and affordably than traditional methods. Yet, the challenge lies in ensuring transparency regarding the use of AI, as some AI-based projects may not disclose their reliance on artificial creation.

Ensuring Trust and Standards

While companies like Faber and Faber initiate their own certifications such as 'Human Written', they face scrutiny about what auditing process confirms true human authorship. Scepticism also arises over self-certification processes, leading to calls for comprehensive checks.

With competition from companies like Books by People and Proudly Human, the need for trusted standards in authorship disclosure is urgent. As the landscape shifts dramatically, these initiatives reflect the ongoing struggle between technological advancement and preserving the integrity of human creativity.