BUSINESS NEWS

Showing 12 articles

Florida Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI, Accusing Company of Concealing Risks","description":"The Florida attorney general has sued OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, alleging the company marketed ChatGPT while hiding potential dangers, including data misuse on minors and encouragement of violent behavior.","summary":"Florida’s attorney general alleges that OpenAI’s ChatGPT was deployed without adequate safeguards, potentially enabling self-harm, violence, and data exploitation of minors. The lawsuit claims the company ignored internal warnings and misled users, prompting state‑level legal action.","image":"https://example.com/florida-openai-lawsuit.jpg","text":"<h1 style=\"font-size:24px;margin-top:0;margin-bottom:12px;\">Florida Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI, Accusing Company of Concealing Risks</h1><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">The state of Florida has filed a civil suit against the artificial‑intelligence firm OpenAI and its chief executive Sam Altman. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims that OpenAI knowingly released and aggressively marketed the GPT‑powered chatbot ChatGPT while concealing serious safety risks.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">Attorney General James Uthmeier said the company ignored internal safety warnings and misled the public about the tool’s potential dangers, especially to children. “OpenAI and Altman ignored internal and external safety warnings, put children at great risk, and let a dangerous product reach millions of Floridians,” Uthmeier told reporters.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">The complaint cites two incidents. In one, a gunman who killed two students and wounded six at Florida State University reportedly asked ChatGPT for help planning the attack. In another, a man who killed two University of South Florida doctoral students had earlier asked the chatbot about disposing a human body in a dumpster, according to prosecutors.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">OpenAI has responded that its models still encourage users to seek professional support for mental health and that it has cooperated with law enforcement in both cases. The company also said it has been actively improving safeguards to detect harmful intent and mitigate misuse.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">Florida’s lawsuit further alleges that ChatGPT collects data from minors without meaningful parental oversight, contributes to behavioral addiction, and can cause cognitive harm. It claims the company downplayed dangerous errors and engaged in deceptive trade practices, violating state consumer‑protection laws.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">The suit seeks accountability and potential damages, asserting that the company’s conduct has caused ongoing harm to Floridians. This marks the first state‑level legal action against an AI developer over safety concerns.\n</p>
AP

Florida Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI, Accusing Company of Concealing Risks","description":"The Florida attorney general has sued OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, alleging the company marketed ChatGPT while hiding potential dangers, including data misuse on minors and encouragement of violent behavior.","summary":"Florida’s attorney general alleges that OpenAI’s ChatGPT was deployed without adequate safeguards, potentially enabling self-harm, violence, and data exploitation of minors. The lawsuit claims the company ignored internal warnings and misled users, prompting state‑level legal action.","image":"https://example.com/florida-openai-lawsuit.jpg","text":"<h1 style=\"font-size:24px;margin-top:0;margin-bottom:12px;\">Florida Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI, Accusing Company of Concealing Risks</h1><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">The state of Florida has filed a civil suit against the artificial‑intelligence firm OpenAI and its chief executive Sam Altman. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims that OpenAI knowingly released and aggressively marketed the GPT‑powered chatbot ChatGPT while concealing serious safety risks.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">Attorney General James Uthmeier said the company ignored internal safety warnings and misled the public about the tool’s potential dangers, especially to children. “OpenAI and Altman ignored internal and external safety warnings, put children at great risk, and let a dangerous product reach millions of Floridians,” Uthmeier told reporters.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">The complaint cites two incidents. In one, a gunman who killed two students and wounded six at Florida State University reportedly asked ChatGPT for help planning the attack. In another, a man who killed two University of South Florida doctoral students had earlier asked the chatbot about disposing a human body in a dumpster, according to prosecutors.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">OpenAI has responded that its models still encourage users to seek professional support for mental health and that it has cooperated with law enforcement in both cases. The company also said it has been actively improving safeguards to detect harmful intent and mitigate misuse.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">Florida’s lawsuit further alleges that ChatGPT collects data from minors without meaningful parental oversight, contributes to behavioral addiction, and can cause cognitive harm. It claims the company downplayed dangerous errors and engaged in deceptive trade practices, violating state consumer‑protection laws.</p><p style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:12px;\">The suit seeks accountability and potential damages, asserting that the company’s conduct has caused ongoing harm to Floridians. This marks the first state‑level legal action against an AI developer over safety concerns.\n</p>

Federal Judge Postpones Baltimore Bridge Collapse Trial After Settlements","description":"A federal judge has delayed the civil trial over the 2024 collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge after a wave of last‑minute settlements resolved most remaining claims.  Judge James Bredar cited frustration over the timing of agreements and said the pause allows for additional settlement possibilities.","summary":"After the container ship Dali crashed into Baltimore’s Key Bridge on March 26 2024, driving six construction workers to death, a federal judge postponed the civil trial that was set to begin early May.  Last‑minute settlements involving the workers’ families and other parties have largely taken care of economic losses and death claims.  Judge Bredar, appointed by President Barack Obama, expressed frustration with the timing of the agreements but acknowledged that civil cases often settle before trial.  Criminal charges against the ship’s operators have been filed separately and remain pending.","image":"https://picsum.photos/id/1042/800/400","text":"<h1 style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-weight:700;font-size:24px;margin-bottom:10px;\">Federal Judge Postpones Baltimore Bridge Collapse Trial After Settlements</h1><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">BALTIMORE, MD — U.S. District Judge James Bredar has agreed to postpone the civil trial that was set to begin this week over the collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge, citing a flurry of last‑minute settlements that settled most of the remaining claims.  The judgment came after the judge’s express frustration about the timing of the agreements, which settled all pending claims over the deaths of six construction workers who were working on pothole repairs when the container ship Dali lost power and crashed into the bridge on March 26 2024.</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">Virtually all of the unresolved claims were economic in nature, alleging losses by businesses and local governments.  None of the remaining parties were seeking to start the trial as scheduled.  In the meantime, Judge Bredar, who was nominated by President Barack Obama, said he would defer the proceedings indefinitely to consider whether additional legal arguments could lead to further settlements, potentially ending the litigation without a trial.</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">Bredar described himself as “highly frustrated” but noted that civil cases often settle on the eve of trial.  He added, \"It’s not directed at just one side or another.  It takes two to tango.  I’m frustrated on behalf of the public (and) the court.\"</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">The settlements with the families of the six workers were not made public.  Less than two weeks earlier, the judge had rejected a request to delay the trial following the filing of criminal charges against the ship’s operators.  On May 12, U.S. prosecutors announced indictments against Singapore‑based Synergy Marine Pte Ltd. and India‑based Synergy Maritime Pte Ltd.  The indictment accuses the operators of conspiracy, misconduct causing death, and obstruction of the National Transportation Safety Board.</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">A previous $2.25 billion settlement was announced in April between the state of Maryland, Synergy Marine and Grace Ocean Private Limited, the Singapore‑based ship owner.  Grace Ocean has not been charged with any crimes related to the collapse.  The city of Baltimore, which joined the companies in seeking a delay, has economic loss claims related to the bridge’s destruction.  The judge’s decision to pause the trial leaves the door open for further settlements and may ultimately end the case without formal litigation.</p>
AP

Federal Judge Postpones Baltimore Bridge Collapse Trial After Settlements","description":"A federal judge has delayed the civil trial over the 2024 collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge after a wave of last‑minute settlements resolved most remaining claims. Judge James Bredar cited frustration over the timing of agreements and said the pause allows for additional settlement possibilities.","summary":"After the container ship Dali crashed into Baltimore’s Key Bridge on March 26 2024, driving six construction workers to death, a federal judge postponed the civil trial that was set to begin early May. Last‑minute settlements involving the workers’ families and other parties have largely taken care of economic losses and death claims. Judge Bredar, appointed by President Barack Obama, expressed frustration with the timing of the agreements but acknowledged that civil cases often settle before trial. Criminal charges against the ship’s operators have been filed separately and remain pending.","image":"https://picsum.photos/id/1042/800/400","text":"<h1 style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-weight:700;font-size:24px;margin-bottom:10px;\">Federal Judge Postpones Baltimore Bridge Collapse Trial After Settlements</h1><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">BALTIMORE, MD — U.S. District Judge James Bredar has agreed to postpone the civil trial that was set to begin this week over the collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge, citing a flurry of last‑minute settlements that settled most of the remaining claims. The judgment came after the judge’s express frustration about the timing of the agreements, which settled all pending claims over the deaths of six construction workers who were working on pothole repairs when the container ship Dali lost power and crashed into the bridge on March 26 2024.</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">Virtually all of the unresolved claims were economic in nature, alleging losses by businesses and local governments. None of the remaining parties were seeking to start the trial as scheduled. In the meantime, Judge Bredar, who was nominated by President Barack Obama, said he would defer the proceedings indefinitely to consider whether additional legal arguments could lead to further settlements, potentially ending the litigation without a trial.</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">Bredar described himself as “highly frustrated” but noted that civil cases often settle on the eve of trial. He added, \"It’s not directed at just one side or another. It takes two to tango. I’m frustrated on behalf of the public (and) the court.\"</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">The settlements with the families of the six workers were not made public. Less than two weeks earlier, the judge had rejected a request to delay the trial following the filing of criminal charges against the ship’s operators. On May 12, U.S. prosecutors announced indictments against Singapore‑based Synergy Marine Pte Ltd. and India‑based Synergy Maritime Pte Ltd. The indictment accuses the operators of conspiracy, misconduct causing death, and obstruction of the National Transportation Safety Board.</p><p style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin-bottom:15px;\">A previous $2.25 billion settlement was announced in April between the state of Maryland, Synergy Marine and Grace Ocean Private Limited, the Singapore‑based ship owner. Grace Ocean has not been charged with any crimes related to the collapse. The city of Baltimore, which joined the companies in seeking a delay, has economic loss claims related to the bridge’s destruction. The judge’s decision to pause the trial leaves the door open for further settlements and may ultimately end the case without formal litigation.</p>


Follow us

© 2024 SwissX REDD UK ltd. All Rights Reserved.