WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s government shutdown is reshaping the federal workforce in unprecedented ways, enabling his budget office to decide who gets paid or fired.
As the shutdown proceeds into its third week, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has announced plans for significant reductions in force, referred to as RIFs. Critics have labeled Trump's budget chief, Russ Vought, the 'grim reaper' for his role in targeting federal employees while ensuring military personnel receive their pay.
With Congress in a state of stalemate, where the Republican-led House is resisting efforts to negotiate and Democrats are pushing for health care funds, the OMB is strategically filling the void by implementing drastic budget cuts across various sectors, including health and education.
Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., condemned the administration's tactics, asserting they are utilizing the shutdown to unfairly target federal workers. He stated, 'It is a big fat lie when Trump and his budget director say that the shutdown is compelling them to fire federal workers,' signaling the potential for legal challenges against these actions.
The shutdown has now extended beyond 14 days, contributing to its status as one of the longest in U.S. history. The OMB’s decisions could affect an estimated 750,000 federal workers, pushing many to the brink of uncertainty regarding their employment status.
In an unusual turn, budget strategies are being devised to maintain funding for military personnel while federal departments face unprecedented cuts, alarming many lawmakers. Trump's plans contrast sharply with typical practices following a government shutdown where furloughed employees generally receive their back pay once funding is restored.
With many federal agencies scrambling to adjust to these actions, the future of several critical government functions hangs in the balance, all while Trump promotes his administrative agenda and goals for mass deportation alongside military support. The situation necessitates ongoing scrutiny as both political leaders and legal entities prepare for potential battlegrounds over the legality of these unprecedented measures.